<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>GeoBliki's Blog: Tag BPMN</title>
    <link>http://wwww.geobliki.com/articles/tag/bpmn?tag=bpmn</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Sensor Web Enabled (SWE) Data Node </description>
    <item>
      <title>Architecture &amp;amp; Process: What was WfXML-R doing at that conference?</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Since &lt;a href='http://www.column2.com/2008/04/architecture-process-pat-cappelaere/trackback/'&gt;Sandy Kemsley&lt;/a&gt; asked the question, I will try to attempt to explain this a second time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.transformationandinnovation.com/pages/ArchitectureProcess2008.htm'&gt;Architecture &amp;amp; Process 2008&lt;/a&gt; is a great avenue to expose users &amp;amp; architects to new key technologies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Enterprise Architecture and current BPM initiatives are pretty much based on a SOAP-based architecture.  This is a wonderful high-octane technology, if you and your pit crew can afford it.  But this is reserved to an elite group targeting a niche market: Corporate America 500 that can afford it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WfXML-R targets that rest of the market (or the remaining 80% of it) with a simpler approach based on several Web 2.0 standards and protocols including Atom/AtomPub, GData, OpenSearch and OpenID/OAuth to manage user authentication, secure transactions and user authority delegation to workflows.   The last two standards were the final keystones to a RESTful architecture that can be used at the Enterprise level.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So what is this doing at this Conference? Hummmmm????&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An RESTful interoperable and non-proprietary standard sponsored by the WfMC and the OpenGeoSpatial Consortium will be a huge achievement for this Community.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The OGC demonstrated three interoperable workflow engines during OWS-5 using WfXML-R inclusing OpenWFE and a BPEL engine.  Hitachi Interstage and the SUNGARD Carnot may very well be next based on discussions we had this week.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is at least satisfying that some other people such as &lt;a href='http://jasonwoodruff.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/wfxml-r/trackback'&gt;Jason Woodruff&lt;/a&gt; got it right away and seem pretty excited about it.
And yes, Jason, Interface 3 could be another one that ought to be included.  But not this time!  BPAF is next and I will let Michael zur Muelhen announce it very soon :).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:d90e997c-46f2-4a54-a44e-0d41bfefa400</guid>
      <author>Patrice Cappelaere</author>
      <link>http://wwww.geobliki.com/articles/2008/04/25/architecture-process-what-was-wfxml-r-doing-at-that-conference</link>
      <category>WfXML</category>
      <category>R</category>
      <category>BPMN</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://wwww.geobliki.com/articles/trackback/251</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Coming Next: Custom Data Products Tailored To Your Specification!</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;We know how to mass produce and disseminate data.  We can even alert you when it is available based on your subscription. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But We cannot stop there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With new capabilities such as &lt;a href='http://eo1.gsfc.nasa.gov/'&gt;Hyperspectral imagers&lt;/a&gt; from space or &lt;a href='http://suborbital.nasa.gov/platforms/aircraft/predator-b.html'&gt;UAV&amp;#8217;s&lt;/a&gt;, we opened up Pandora&amp;#8217;s box.  There is now an infinite way of looking at a particular scene.  Are you interested in Fire, Water, Plume/Clouds, Contaminants, Oil Slicks&amp;#8230;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you Red Cross, USCG, Forest Service, USDA, First Responder or even NORTHCOM?  This might be for you!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our next challenge is to customize data products to your requirement and deliver it just-in-time for free (if we can).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This might include tasking a satellite or UAV!
This might include using the expertise of scientists from NASA JPL or GSFC or even tap into one of many universities cooperating on this project (UMD, WUSTL, UAH, GMU&amp;#8230;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is the secret sauce we are working on?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href='http://www.opengeospatial.org/'&gt;OGC&lt;/a&gt; standards&amp;#8230; of course.
and &lt;a href='http://www.georss.org/'&gt;GeoRSS&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Think Workflows (but not BPEL:).  Thanks &lt;a href='http://jmettraux.wordpress.com/'&gt;John&lt;/a&gt; for your support and a great product with &lt;a href='http://openwferu.rubyforge.org/'&gt;OpenWFEru&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and down the road: BPMN&amp;#8230;XPDL 2.0?&amp;#8230;but that&amp;#8217;s another post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:a70cb8ba-2159-41f4-9f0a-9d486aa84598</guid>
      <author>Patrice Cappelaere</author>
      <link>http://wwww.geobliki.com/articles/2007/03/21/coming-next-custom-data-products-tailored-to-your-specification</link>
      <category>BPMN</category>
      <category>XPDL</category>
      <category>workflow</category>
      <category>OpenWFEru</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
